I haven’t had time or energy to blodge much. Haven’t been keeping up on other people, either.
My life is a blur of medical bullshit, entertainment news, unix sysadmin tasks, spyware, and spam. Lots and lots of spyware and spam. In lieu of telling you lots of boring details about this I will paste a typical reading item for me lately below.
Content analysis details: (28.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
—- ———————- ————————————————–
1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:…type= entry
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
2.1 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
0.4 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked – see ]
1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK_LESS Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID,
more specific)
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HTML Stock spam image part, with distinctive HTML
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HDR_FROM Stock spam image part, with distinctive From line
28 out of 5!
W000T!
(I wonder if spammers chest-butt?)
LikeLike
I was wondering where you’d been lately. I’ve missed you! (Not in a gay way, of course.)
I hope things are okay with you and that the medical bullshit isn’t too awful.
LikeLike
SpamAssassin
good to see our code is proving useful, at least π
LikeLike
Re: SpamAssassin
It really is. Thank you very, very much.
Also, I love that icon.
LikeLike
Re: SpamAssassin
you’re welcome!
re the user pic: it’s great, isn’t it. All credit to Kubrick, of course… it’s his shot, after all π
LikeLike
Why not try out a Bayesian filter like Popfile?
Once you’ve fed a Bayesian 1000 or so spam emails (so, like, a week’s worth), it classifies spam with a better than 99.9% success rate.
I swear by it. It’s not 100% perfect, but it works way better than… erm… certain spam filters installed by email providers.
LikeLike
This has a Bayesian filter built in to it, and it’s pretty good. Some of the crazy image-only spams outwit those filters pretty badly, so I was glad to find FuzzyOCR at ‘s suggestion.
LikeLike
I’d like to see you this weekend. In other news, does that text up there mean something, like the formula for Air Jordans or something?
LikeLike
If you’re using the Barracuda spam filtering system and you’re tired of getting spammed, I recommend *not* clicking the “Report as Spam” button. I’ve been getting a lot less spam ever since I stopped, but it’s not perfect.
LikeLike
I use a program called SpamAssassin, which is why you see me in this thread thanking and his associates for writing it. More info is at http://spamassassin.apache.org/
It’s great, especially if like me you have to run several mail servers and you don’t want your users to get spammed.
LikeLike