The shot

Political violence is frightening and enraging. In the case of Dr. Tiller’s death this week, the violence was explicitly religious and terrorist in intent. What’s worse is the behavior of political and media leaders who supported and gave a voice to dangerous extremists. That’s an institutional problem and those people must be called to account.

But let’s remember everyone else who got shot in the U.S. last week. The others weren’t politically controversial, well-known professionals. Some of them were jerks or screwups, others were children or retirees or just unremarkable people walking down their streets. And many of them were victims of explicitly terrorist organizations: street gangs doing local ethnic cleansing, corrupt police forces, mafias.

And these people are written off too, by the same politicians and media authorities. They generally don’t exist, and when they are mentioned at all it’s assumed that they were up to no good and therefore deserved what they got. No one deserves a death like that.

There were a lot of them. This small sampling locally gives some idea.

So don’t let the outrage from Dr. Tiller’s death stop. Keep it rolling, because the powers that be need to keep hearing that we don’t approve of anyone’s murder, at all.

17 thoughts on “The shot

  1. But it’s not only as bad as every other murder. It’s worse, because what’s at stake is millions of women’s autonomy.
    What I’m trying to say is, lack of access to abortion is a concrete issue people can do something about. Or if you’d rather work on reducing the number of cars on the road so fewer people die in car accidents, or limiting the number of guns in circulation so fewer people get shot, that’s cool too. But turning it all into a general statement of “murder is bad” is paralyzing.


    1. I agree.
      I put this piece wrong. I didn’t intent an equivalency between Dr. Tiller’s murder and any other street murder. The parallel was between the talking heads and political opportunists who tacitly approve of shooting abortion doctors, and the same people writing off entire communities.
      In one case the pile of murder victims is higher, and in the other case the women’s rights and public health issues tower. In both cases, malign neglect and demagoguery in authority are my chosen target.


      1. Sometimes LJ is like a scratch pad that bites back. And I like that; instant feedback from someone who cares is the best thing Thanks 😀


      2. I’ll confess to having a number of friends who believe that Dr. Tiller “had it coming to him” or “got what he deserved” — and none of them seem to wonder about the implications of what happens when a society thinks that it is appropriate to effect change through violence rather than through voting/campaigning/lobbying/running for office/proposing a constitutional amendment/any of the umpteen million LEGAL and ORDERLY ways of doing so.
        Some talking points besides “you are a small-minded barbarian” would be nice here; even if that’s the sentiment I want to convey, I’d like to do so with even a small chance of making the recipient take pause and think for a second.
        Any suggestions?


  2. I agree with you with respect to murder, but let us not stop there how about the people that die from the lack of medical care, the people that die of starvations and those that are killed by idiots behind the wheels of cars.


  3. Maybe I just wasn’t pissed enough in the ’90s, and maybe I just didn’t notice that it was just as bad back then, but I really don’t like how the public discourse, at least in some quarters, has backslid to the point where it’s okay for some people to be ambivalent about a doctor being shot by a religious zealot, or that we have a “debate” about whether it’s okay to torture people.
    Fucked without the rule of law indeed.


  4. I don’t know — the way I read your post the first time (before the comments above were made) made total sense to me.
    Dr. Tiller’s murder was awful, obviously. But all around me (literally) are senseless murders — yes, street murders — that are seldom commented on even within my high-crime community, seldom considered by folks who live in “safe” neighborhoods (i.e., neighborhoods that are not holding pens for the dislocated or for those who are maligned in other ways by a government that not only fails them but clearly oppresses them).
    I’m surprised to see folks agreeing with ‘s assertion that Dr. Tiller’s murder is WORSE than other murders because of its effect on women. Dr. Tiller’s murder is horrible — as is the impact that it will have on the women he served. But worse? That kind of judgement is dismissive to, for instance, the folks who are suffering violence due to institutionalized racism — and it’s an example of how the pro-choice movement gets a bad reputation among communities who are literally fighting for survival every day.
    Murder is wrong. The results are devastating, across the board. There are many family members who never see an outcry or a vigil for the murder of there loved ones. And, in addition to remembering Dr. Tiller, we should be mindful of those folks as well, and try to turn some of our momentum their direction.


    1. Yes, that’s exactly what I meant.
      As political assassination and terrorist intimidation, Dr. Tiller’s murder is significant and important as a public event. In that sense it isn’t “just another murder.”
      But murders aren’t “just another,” either. Each one is the worst thing, over and over. Women who are stuck in tough neighborhoods get shot themselves or end up crying over their dead sons like Mother Mary… AND they suffer the effects of terrorist threats against women’s health professionals. Jackpot.
      There’s no need to argue over which murderously malign neglect is more tolerable, because it all demands focused outrage.


  5. Thanks for putting plainly that Tiller’s death was “explicitly religious and terrorist in intent.” That is not being honestly presented in broadcast news, and that upsets me as it seems to indicate tacit approval.


  6. Taking the life of another without permission, is a tragedy. In recent NPR broadcast I heard quite a number of people who identified as pro-life with regard to abortion, denounce this killing as antithetical to their beliefs. It was heartening.
    On the flip side, I hope that some good can come out of this death. Perhaps both sides of the abortion debate can stop foaming with self-righteousness long enough to open up a dialogue. Maybe I live in a fools paradise to believe this possible.
    However, the deaths of all of the people in the link you provided, are equally tragic. I am dumbfounded at the idea that taking Dr. Tiller’s life is somehow more objectionable then the taking of any other of lives listed in the LA Times body count blog. I honestly don’t get it. Why is intentional killing of one person is more acceptable than the intentional killing of another? I’m not being snide or glib here. I really do not understand.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.